Type:
Whole Allergen
Whole Allergen
Whole Allergen
Swine epithelium
inhalation
Suidae
Sus scrofa
Sus scrofa
Contact with swine epithelium or derived proteins occurs mainly during swine farming. Animal rehabilitation facilities, veterinary practice, owning pigs as pets, and contact with wild boars also allow contact with S. scrofa epithelium. Swine farming is frequently associated with adverse respiratory effects including rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, decreased lung function, however, IgE sensitization to swine epithelium is infrequent. Similarly, hypersensitivity pneumonitis associated with swine farming is seldom associated with swine epithelial antigens. IgE sensitization to swine epithelium has been proposed as a marker of endocarditis on cardiac valve bioprosthesis.
Swine epithelium.
Species S. scrofa comprises domestic swine (S. scrofa domesticus) and wild boar (S. scrofa) [1].
Taxonomic table |
|
Domain |
Eukaryota |
Kingdom |
Metazoa (Animalia) |
Phylum |
Chordata |
Subphylum |
Vertebrata |
Class |
Mammalia |
Order |
Artiodactyla |
Family |
Suidae |
Genus |
Sus |
Species |
S. scrofa |
Swine epithelium (skin).
Unlike cat, dog, or horse, S. scrofa is infrequently kept as a family pet [2]. Therefore, contact with swine epithelium occurs mainly as a result of occupational exposure: swine farming, veterinarians, other agricultural workers [3]. The increase in unconventional pet keeping may also result in increased contact with S. scrofa epithelium [4]. Conversely, despite wild boar hunting being practiced worldwide and boar farming receiving increasing interest [1], no reported allergy to boar epithelium has been reported yet. Porcine bioprosthesis for heart valve replacement has been associated with IgE sensitization to swine epithelium and in rare cases to noninfectious endocarditis attributed to swine allergy [5, 6].
The main route of exposure to swine epithelium is through inhalation of allergenic molecules [3].
Direct skin contact with swine epithelium and surgical implantation of porcine bioprosthetic materials are alternative routes of exposure [3, 5].
Despite swine farming being associated with adverse respiratory conditions, IgE sensitization to swine epithelium is an infrequent finding, the main pathophysiological culprit being IgE-independent mechanisms [3].
Allergic reactions to porcine bioprostheses for valvular replacement have been associated to endocarditis [5, 6].
Porcine serumalbumin Sus s 1 is the only swine allergen included in the IUIS/WHO database as of June 2022 [7]. Allergens of the serumalbumin family including Sus s 1 are found in meat and on epithelia, display cross-reactivity and cannot be used as allergen markers for genuine sensitization [8].
Name |
Biochemical activity |
Molecular weight (kDa) |
Glycosylation |
Major/minor allergen |
Marker allergen |
IUIS |
Reference |
Sus s 1 |
swine serumalbumine |
60 |
|
Minor |
No |
Yes |
[7, 8] |
There is partial cross-reactivity between swine hair and dander and hair, dander and serum from other domestic animals and pets [9]. Swine epithelium is not involved in the so-called pork-cat syndrome, which is due to allergen cross-reactivity between cat dander and pork meat [8].
Author: Joana Vitte
Reviewer: Dr. Christian Fischer
Last reviewed: June 2022.