Type:
Component
Component
Component
Ara h 18
Cyclophilin - peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase
f458
18 kDA
Ingestion
Recombinant protein
Cyclophilin - peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase
Ara h 18 is a newly discovered peanut allergen component from the cyclophilin protein family with a molecular mass of 18.2 kDa [1]. Biochemically, members of the cyclophilin protein family have the enzymatic function of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases and are known for their high-affinity binding to the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporine A [2]. Cyclophilins are highly conserved and have been reported as IgE binding proteins in grass, tree, and weed pollen, several plant foods such as peanut, carrot, pumpkin, and tomato, as well as in several fungi and house dust mites [1], and are officially recognized allergens in several of those allergen sources [3].
Peanuts are consumed across the world and according to literature, peanut allergy affects approximately 2% of the population in Western nations, with data suggesting an increasing prevalence and incidence [4]. Peanut allergy usually begins in childhood, with 22% acquiring tolerance by age 4, 27% by age 12 and persisting throughout the affected individual’s lifetime in a majority of patients [4, 5].
In a study with 109 individuals, who were IgE positive to peanut but had a negative result (<0.35 kUA/l) to all peanut components available for specific IgE testing in clinical routine (Ara h 1-3, 6, 8-9) and showed grass pollen cross-reactivity, 35 samples (32%) were found to have IgE to Ara h 18, with a median level among positives of 10.6 kUA/l. While Ara h 18 was comparable to profilin (36%) regarding prevalence and magnitude of sensitization in this population, 13 of the samples were uniquely positive to Ara h 18 [1].
Ara h 18 is a cyclophilin protein peanut allergen component.
The peanut (Arachis hypogaea) belongs to the legume family (Leguminosae) (6).
The clinical patterns of peanut allergy, from asymptomatic sensitization to severe clinical manifestations, depend on the exposure routes and the physicochemical properties of the involved peanut proteins [7].
Primary sensitization to peanut is generally characterized by sensitization to the storage proteins Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and/or Ara h 6 and sensitization to these components is often associated with severe allergic symptoms to peanut [7-10].
Plant cyclophilins are highly cross-reactive [11]. Cross-reactive pollen sensitization may cause a positive test result to peanut despite the absence of primary peanut sensitization. Individuals with IgE antibodies only to pollen-associated targets are considered to have a low risk of a severe reaction to peanut [10].
Cyclophilins could carry a risk of severe symptoms and reactions, similar to Lipid Transfer Proteins (LTPs) and defensins, but lower than oleosins and storage proteins. Inhibition results using grass pollen extract showed that Ara h 18 is probably not a primary sensitizer, but a cross-reactive determinant [1, 7].
In an Italian multicentric cohort of 253 pediatric patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and birch pollen sensitization, IgE to Bet v 7, a cyclophilin with high cross-reactivity to Ara h 18, was found in 43 (17%) patients. Ten of the 43 patients were apparently monosensitized to Bet v 7. In this cohort, a significant association of Bet v 7 sensitization with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) and asthma was found in univariate analysis. However, adjusting on sensitization to other pollen-food cross-reactive allergens (Bet v 1, profilin, and LTP) resulted in the loss of significance for Bet v 7 association. Finally, among the 10 patients with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis apparently monosensitized to Bet v 7, none suffered from OAS, but seven were asthmatic [12].
Cyclophilins are highly conserved proteins and extensive immunological cross-reactivity has been demonstrated between cyclophilins from different sources. Ara h 18 has a high sequence similarity to pollen cyclophilins from birch, olive and periwinkle [1]. Sequence identity has been shown to correlate with immunological cross-reactivity and might have implications in the clinic [13, 14]. However, functional data are not yet available regarding the ability of cyclophilins, such as Ara h 18, to induce IgE-mediated activation and degranulation of mast cells and/or basophils [1, 12].
At the time of writing, 18 peanut allergens have been officially recognized [3].
Ara h 18 has a molecular mass of 18.2 kDa and is a cyclophilin protein [1]. Biochemically, members of the cyclophilin protein family have the enzymatic function of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases and are known for their high-affinity binding to the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporine A [2]. They have a folded protein structure with a hydrophobic core, composed of four antiparallel beta-sheets, closely packed with four additional beta-sheets and two alpha-helices [11]. Ara h 18 heat stability has not yet been elucidated. .
Ara h 18 is 88-91 % identical to cyclophilins in birch (Bet v 7), olive (Ole e 15) and periwinkle (Cat r 1) pollen [1, 12, 14].
Ara h 18 is unlikely to be a primary sensitizer, but a cross-reactive determinant, binding IgE antibodies elicited by sensitization to another common allergen source, such as pollen. Ara h 18 may be helpful in explaining a positive peanut sensitization test result in the absence of IgE to currently available peanut components, which may elicit unjustified anxiety and unnecessary dietary avoidance/restriction [1].
Author: Dr. Joana Vitte
Reviewer: Dr. Michael Spangfort
Last reviewed: 2024-12-17
1. Mattsson L, Valcour A, Holmqvist M, Larsson H, Lidholm J. Cyclophilin - A novel cross-reactive determinant in peanut. Clin Exp Allergy. 2021;51(4):620-2.
2. Stamnes MA, Rutherford SL, Zuker CS. Cyclophilins: a new family of proteins involved in intracellular folding. Trends Cell Biol. 1992;2(9):272-6.
3. Subcommittee IWAN. IUIS/WHO Allergen Nomenclature 2023 [Available from: http://allergen.org/index.php.
4. Lieberman JA, Gupta RS, Knibb RC, Haselkorn T, Tilles S, Mack DP, et al. The global burden of illness of peanut allergy: A comprehensive literature review. Allergy. 2021;76(5):1367-84.
5. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy: A review and update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(1):41-58.
6. Gepts P, Beavis WD, Brummer EC, Shoemaker RC, Stalker HT, Weeden NF, et al. Legumes as a model plant family. Genomics for food and feed report of the Cross-Legume Advances Through Genomics Conference. Plant Physiol. 2005;137(4):1228-35.
7. Dramburg S, Hilger C, Santos AF, de Las Vecillas L, Aalberse RC, Acevedo N, et al. EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2023;34 Suppl 28:e13854.
8. Nicolaou N, Poorafshar M, Murray C, Simpson A, Winell H, Kerry G, et al. Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(1):191-7 e1-13.
9. Agabriel C, Ghazouani O, Birnbaum J, Liabeuf V, Porri F, Gouitaa M, et al. Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 sensitization predicts peanut allergy in Mediterranean pediatric patients. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. 2014;25(7):662-7.
10. Krogulska A, Wood RA. Peanut allergy diagnosis: Moving from basic to more elegant testing. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020;31(4):346-57.
11. Potapova E SH, Scala E, Matricardi PM, Poncet P. Cyclophilins and gibberellin-regulated proteins in IgE-mediated allergic diseases. Allergo Journal International. 2023;32(October 2023):280-8.
12. Matricardi PM, Potapova E, Panetta V, Lidholm J, Mattsson L, Scala E, et al. IgE to cyclophilins in pollen-allergic children: Epidemiologic, clinical, and diagnostic relevance of a neglected panallergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024.
13. Cadot P, Nelles L, Srahna M, Dilissen E, Ceuppens JL. Cloning and expression of the cyclophilin Bet v 7, and analysis of immunological cross-reactivity among the cyclophilin A family. Mol Immunol. 2006;43(3):226-35.
14. San Segundo-Acosta P, Oeo-Santos C, Benede S, de Los Rios V, Navas A, Ruiz-Leon B, et al. Delineation of the Olive Pollen Proteome and Its Allergenome Unmasks Cyclophilin as a Relevant Cross-Reactive Allergen. J Proteome Res. 2019;18(8):3052-66.