clear search
Search
Search Suggestions
Recent searches Clear History
Contact Us

Components and OAS: Diagnosis supported by molecular allergology increases the probability of appropriate SIT treatment

Paul, a 14-year-old boy with a history of severe rhino-conjunctivitis, visits his healthcare provider after two episodes of asthma during late spring and summer. Paul also experiences oral allergy syndrome when eating various fruits and vegetables (tomatoes, melon, mandarin, kiwi, and peaches). His parents want Paul to undergo specific immunotherapy (SIT). 

Paul's healthcare provider conducts a full clinical history and physical examination and decides to test using grass pollen components. 
 

Paul has a history of rhino-conjunctivitis, episodes of asthma, and oral allergy syndrome (OAS) when eating some fruits and vegetables.

Patient History

Family History

  • Atopic mother

Paul's Personal History

  • He was diagnosed as allergic to egg and milk after presenting with eczema at 12 months old.
  • At 8 years old, he exhibited recurrent mild to moderate seasonal rhino-conjunctivitis.
  • He was previously tested and subsequently diagnosed with a pollen allergy. 
     
Skin Prick Test Results

Test

Type

Paul's Results

Egg

Whole Allergen

0

Milk

Whole Allergen

0

Grass Mix

Whole Allergen

+3

Birch

Whole Allergen

+2

Paul’s previous healthcare provider recommended that he use oral antihistamines and nasal steroids during pollen season. 

Paul’s ImmunoCAP™ Test Results

These results together with this patient's case history and symptoms, help confirm the diagnosis.
 

ImmunoCAP Test Results (kUA/I)
Allergen

Type

Paul's Results

Timothy

Whole Allergen

11.1

Birch

Whole Allergen

8.3

Tomato

Whole Allergen

4.2

Melon

Whole Allergen

7.1

Peach

Whole Allergen

3.9

Kiwi

Whole Allergen

6.5

 

 

ImmunoCAP Test Results (kUA/I)
Allergen

Type

Paul's Results

Phl p 1

Allergen Component

10.4

Phl p 5b

Allergen Component

3.9

Phl p 6

Allergen Component

1.1

Phl p 12 (profilin)

Allergen Component

8.7

Bet v 2 (profilin)

Allergen Component

6.3

Differential Diagnosis

The significant IgE levels to the grass-specific components Phl p 1 and 5b indicate a “true” grass pollen sensitization. Paul’s IgE response to profilin also supports the noted OAS to various fruits and vegetables.1
 

REFINED DIAGNOSIS

  • Timothy grass pollen allergy.
     

HEALTHCARE PROVIDER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Paul's healthcare provider advises him to:

  • Undergo Timothy grass SIT treatment.
  • Avoid tomatoes, melon, mandarin, kiwi, or peaches if unpleasant.

 

FOLLOW UP

  • After two years of SIT, Paul’s pollen symptoms improved significantly. Also, an improvement in the food allergy was noted, probably due to the allergen load reduction.

The people, places, and events depicted in these case studies and photographs do not represent actual patients, nor are they affiliated in any way with Thermo Fisher Scientific.

References
  1. Matricardi PM, Kleine-Tebbe J, Hoffmann HJ, Valenta R, Hilger C, et al. EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016;27 Suppl 23:1-250.